Knocked out Jacq

Throwing punches at parenthood

Today

So, we’ve started settling into life with twins. The main thing I’ve finally grasped is that nothing is predictable: as soon as I think we’ve figured out what Hattie and Joe need, everything changes. This is becoming normal, finally.

I look at my gorgeous children and I can’t believe that we’ve made these two miraculous people, and that I’m the centre of their universe. I marvel at the fact that my body grew them and nourished them, and that they’re now steadily gaining weight solely as a result of me nursing them. How incredible is that, that my body can make and feed people!

But man, it’s hard work at times. For much of the time I feel like life is fascinating on a micro level – it’s amazing, watching a baby gradually learn how to do something, like hold a toy and bring it up to their mouth for further investigation. But off-setting this small scale interesting stuff is the broader knowledge that I’m becoming impossibly dull, with little to talk about that isn’t baby-related. I feel a bit like my brain is dissolving into mush, even though I know that it’s right, and necessary, that I should focus almost exclusively on my babies at this stage. I’m perfectly at peace with it most of the time, but at other moments I catch myself talking about something baby-related like it’s actually of interest to the poor sod listening to me, and I just want to give myself a slap, and issue a general apology.

What never ceases to amaze me is the way in which each day can ebb and flow. So much happens! And nothing really happens!

Today, Hattie and Joe had heavy colds, requiring us to siphon vast quantities of snot out of them. Understandably, this process isn’t popular with either baby, but when they’re so congested that they can barely feed properly we all have to grit our teeth/toothless gums and deal with it. These are their first colds, and they’ve been under the weather for a few days now. They’ve stayed remarkably chipper, considering how rough they seem to feel.

Today, we tried to break the recent habit of two early morning feeds. During the past couple of weeks Hattie and Joe have been sleeping quite badly (that sleep regression thing, and also probably something to do with their developmental stage – and I will write more about that soon). A month ago they were regularly sleeping at night for long stretches – anything from five hours to eight hours at a time – but more recently they’ve wanted three hourly overnight feeds, and have sometimes woken up hourly between the two of them. We know that it’s totally normal and that it should settle down again, but it’s bloody hard to start to become used to decent amounts of uninterrupted sleep, only to get woken up a lot again. The trick at the moment is to balance the need to pander to them a little bit (in light of their current sleep-regressing, skill-acquiring, heavy cold-having state), while not getting to the point where frequent night feeds become a habit. They’re big babies now: they shouldn’t need to feed that frequently – they’ve adjusted quite easily to a four-hourly daytime feeding routine. Anyway, we successfully resettled without feeding when the babies woke up at 1ish, fed them at 2.30ish, and then didn’t hear from them again until 7. Success!

Today, off the back of decent night sleep, Hattie and Joe had really good daytime naps. They self-settled easily, with minimal fuss, and managed to sleep through most of their sleep cycles without needing to be resettled. This is major progress! Recently I’ve had to haunt their room at key points during their naps, ready to swoop in and shush and pat them if they started to stir. I still checked them, but they hardly needed me.

Today, this little girl became very interested in her pink puppy rattle for the first time…

20130610-214236.jpg

…but was still happy to pose for a photo:

20130610-214359.jpg

Today, this little boy chilled out in the bumbo and watched some telly while I put his sister to bed for a nap:

20130610-214533.jpg

Today, both babies were absolute nightmares when bedtime rolled around: it took around 90 minutes of crying, resettling, crying, and resettling before they both fell asleep. It was so frustrating – we thought we’d sorted out bedtimes a while ago, but Joe, in particular, is making it difficult at the moment. And Hattie was perfectly calm, but when she heard Joe kicking off she decided that she’d join in and add her incredibly shrill shriek to the cacophony that her brother was producing. She is such a fraud when she does this kind of thing. I’d go in there to settle her (while Tristan was settling Joe), and she’d stop crying instantly, grin as soon as she saw me, and then, if I stayed in the room, she’d give me a bit of sideways glance and then let out an ungodly yowl. And one time I walked in and she was lying on her back with Betty her bear draped over her face – pretty much like this, which is how she was when I went to check on her during a nap the other day:

20130610-215428.jpg

Her face was entirely covered by Betty tonight, so I gingerly lifted her away, thinking that Hattie had gone to sleep like that… only to find her beaming at me, looking for all the world like she had put Betty there with the express purpose of playing peek a boo with me for a bit of a laugh. She cracks me up on a daily basis – I love the way that she interacts with me, like she’s conspiring with me to make life fun.

Today, darling Joe chortled at me when I sang to him, gave me the most adorable smiles, and gazed at me with his beautiful eyes like I was the best thing he’d ever seen.

20130610-220206.jpg

On balance, today was a pretty good day with my sweet little babies.

Happy Hattie

A couple of weeks ago I posted some cute photos of happy Joe wriggling away in his bouncy chair. Here’s his equally happy sister a few days ago: less wriggly in these shots, but feeling on top form after a nice long morning sleep.

20130601-203055.jpg

20130601-203135.jpg

20130601-203218.jpg

20130601-203259.jpg

20130601-203356.jpg

Lactation cookie slice

Since having the babies I’ve been snacking on lactation cookies. I can’t remember how I first heard about these supposedly magical cookies that supported milk production, but in my (at the time) heavily pregnant state they sounded like a great idea. I googled to find a lactation cookie recipe (every recipe is pretty much the same), and my mother made a batch for me when Hattie and Joe arrived.

Since then, I’ve made many batches for myself, and a couple of batches for friends with newborns, and we’ve all happily munched a few of them each day. My friend Michelle, the most recent recipient of my cookie gifting, reckons that her milk production trebled after snacking on a few cookies! The supposedly active ingredients – or lactogenic foods, as they’re apparently called – are oats, brewers yeast, and flaxseed meal (also known as linseed meal). You can buy flaxseed/linseed meal and brewers yeast at health food shops.

While these cookies were, at worst, a delicious snack for a breast feeding mother, they were also a bit of a faff to make – particularly if you’re trying to do so while juggling two newborns. I decided to see if I could modify the cookie recipe to turn it into a slice, neatly eliminating the two most time-consuming elements of the process: creaming butter and sugar, and rolling out cookies (particularly fiddly when the dough is sticky, like this one is).

My first attempt to make a lactation slice didn’t work out: I tried too hard to cut down on the butter, and the resulting slice was too dry. Also, the brown sugar of the original recipe makes a toffee-like substance when combined with melted butter – delicious, but not good for binding together the dry ingredients. And I’d messed around with the proportions of some of the other ingredients. The result was a very crispy slice that didn’t cut easily and was more like a crumble topping (it was still delicious, though, so I’ve been eating it on top of stewed fruit). For my second attempt, I stuck close to the original recipe for the most part, with just a few tweaks (Such as using white sugar, rather than brown sugar). And it worked!

This lactation cookie slice tastes exactly the same as the cookies, but it’s so much quicker to make. You could make life even easier by measuring out all of the dry ingredients (excluding the sugar, which is added with the wet ingredients) and storing the dry mixture in a container until you want to bake the slices – you could then whip it up in the time it takes for your oven to come up to temperature.

LACTATION COOKIE SLICE

Ingredients

  • Two cups of plain flour
  • One teaspoon of baking soda
  • 1/4 teaspoon of salt
  • Four tablespoons of brewers yeast
  • Three cups of rolled oats
  • Two tablespoons of flaxseed meal
  • 1/2 cup of dessicated coconut or shredded coconut
  • Two cups of added goodies (see below for further information)
  • 200g butter
  • One and a half cups of white sugar
  • Two eggs
  • Added goodies: these are the yummy bits. I’ve tried to strike a balance between taste and value – I did some research to see if any fruit or nuts were considered lactogenic, and found out that almonds and apricots were on the list. When I made the slice pictured in this post, my two cups of added goodies consisted of:

  • Half a cup of dark chocolate chips
  • Half a cup of slivered almonds
  • Half a cup of sultanas
  • Half a cup of chopped dried apricots
  • Method

    Preheat the oven to 180C. Line two slice tins with non-stick baking paper.

    Sieve the flour, baking soda, salt, and brewers yeast into a large mixing bowl.

    Add the rolled oats, flaxseed meal, coconut, and added goodies, and stir to combine thoroughly. The combined dry ingredients will look like this:

    20130530-181718.jpg

    Crack the two eggs into a small bowl, and beat with a fork.

    Melt the butter in a small saucepan. Remove it from the heat and stir in the sugar. Stir in the beaten eggs. The combined wet ingredients will look like this:

    20130530-182203.jpg

    Add the wet ingredients to the dry ingredients, and stir well to combine. This will take a couple if minutes, as there will be a lot of dry stuff to moisten. The combined mixture will look like this:

    20130530-182557.jpg

    Divide the mixture between the two slice pans, and use your hands to press it into place:

    20130530-182800.jpg

    Bake for 25 minutes, or until golden:

    20130530-183204.jpg

    Leave the slices in their tins for five minutes after taking them out of the oven, and then carefully lift them out (by holding the overhanging baking paper), and leave to cool on a wire rack. Cut when cold. It should look like this:

    20130530-183353.jpg

    Eat and enjoy! Store in an airtight container.

    Four month sleep regression

    So, it turns out that having a couple of four month old babies means that I have to deal with twice the dosage of what I now know is ‘four month sleep regression’. Not to put too fine a point on it, this sucks the big kumara.

    If you have no idea what I’m talking about, allow me to enlighten you by quoting a very informative article from The Sleep Lady.

    I’m writing a lot about this topic because, once again, it’s one of those things that I knew nothing about before experiencing it myself: nobody had told me that, at four months, my babies might go a bit crazy. It’s the growth spurt thing all over again: I had no idea that they were going to happen, or how to deal with them when the did strike, and I found it so frustrating when I had no idea what was going on. With growth spurts, if somebody had said to me, “hey, after three weeks or so the babies will start doing nothing but grizzling and feeding for a couple of days – just go with it, because it’s a growth spurt and things will settle down again” I would have felt far better equipped to deal with it. Forewarned is forearmed, after all. Now, I’ve had my eureka moment about the current unsettled behaviour we’re experiencing, and I want to make sure that anybody who might read this before their baby reaches the same stage can feel a little bit more prepared. It might just be me, but I find it significantly easier to cope with challenging baby-related situations if a) I understand why they’re happening; and b) I know that the current situation is finite (because when you’re breast feeding around the clock, or resettling your screaming baby for the tenth time in as many hours, it really can feel as if life will never improve).

    Anyway, here’s The Sleep Lady’s lowdown on four month sleep regression, along with my comments. This post should be read as the first part of a two part series, because I also want to talk about Wonder Weeks (which can help to explain what the heck is going on).

    You’ve got the schedule down. Baby is FINALLY sleeping more…and then, WHAM! Suddenly she’s not. Welcome to what is commonly referred to as the 4 month sleep regression. Some may refer to this phase as increased wakefulness, but it all amounts to the same thing: you and baby have newly found your groove, and now baby just isn’t acting like herself.

    This (very common) sleep regression is characterized by a distinct change in your baby’s behavior. Some indicators that you’re experiencing the 4 month sleep regression (other than the fact that your baby is 4 months old) are:

    • Increased fussiness;

    • Multiple night wakings (especially if your baby has just begun to sleep longer stretches during the night);

    • Reduced naps or “disaster naps”; and

    • Changes in appetite.

    That is EXACTLY what has happened to us this week. Hattie and Joe were sleeping really well, and now they’re not. Last night we were up with them every hour, for the first time in their short lives. Their daytime naps have gone to hell in a handbasket – a week ago I was managing to get them to have at least one 90 minute morning sleep, and often at least two sleeps of that length or longer, plus one or two 45 minute naps (with some resettling to get them to sleep for more than an hour). In the past two days they have each had only one day sleep that has lasted more than an hour. Today, Joe slept for 35 minutes this morning, 40 minutes over lunch, and 40 minutes later in the afternoon. All play and no sleep makes Joe a cranky boy.

    And oh, the increased fussiness! Hattie has become quite the drama queen (and let’s be honest, she was starting from a fairly melodramatic point). At the end of some of her feeds she’s started crying uncontrollably, for no apparent reason (no wind, etc). Or she’ll be happily playing one minute, and will burst into tears the next, refusing to be comforted with cuddles.

    And our loose three hourly feeding schedule seems to be increasingly condensed into feeds every two and a half hours.

    4 Month Sleep Regression

    In other words, your baby’s sleep schedule just turned on its head. The good news? This probably means that your baby is growing. According to research done by Rijt and Plooij, authors of Wonder Weeks, your baby is becoming more engaged in the world around him. As your baby realizes that he can interact with his world, he also begins to realize that his actions affect others, and that he has a bit more control of his surroundings.

    Spoiler alert: reading this paragraph earlier this evening has made me already feel more equipped to cope with the current situation. Although it’s bonkers to feel like your babies are actively trying to make life difficult, sometimes it’s hard not to start attributed machiavellian levels of cunning to these little people. It does me good to be reminded that they are learning stuff at a rate that would cause an adult’s head to explode, and that their behaviour is obviously going to be affected.

    More commonly, this sleep regression is associated with growth spurts. You may notice that your baby has outgrown his current wardrobe, or has begun to increase his mobility (it’s not uncommon for babies to learn to roll over during this time).

    This is definitely the case with Hattie and Joe. Hattie has just grown into her 0 – 3 sized clothing, and some of it already looks a little skimpy, and Joe is absolutely thriving. And they’re both practising movements to get them over onto their tummies – there is a lot of legs getting pulled up and little baby bodies suddenly on their sides.

    Parents often can’t figure out why their sweet baby is suddenly a sleep deprived, fussy, cranky, overtired baby overnight. They begin to question if it could be an ear infection, teething, lack of supply (for breastfeeding moms), or maybe he’s got reflux…the list goes on. What parents don’t often realize is that around this time your baby’s sleep rhythms have also changed (just to throw more into the mix of their little world changing).

    My automatic assumption is that the babies have just gone feral…

    I haven’t had any concerns about my milk supply, which is good, but I did take Hattie to see our doctor yesterday, because of her new-found habit of crying after feeds (which I feared was a sign of reflux). And I’ve attributed a lot of her fussiness to teething.

    Infant Sleep Patterns

    As an infant, your baby probably slept just fine anywhere and everywhere. This is because while an infant does cycle through sleep, there aren’t distinct sleep stages like an older baby or adult may experience. According to Dr. Richard Ferber, newborn babies spend much of their sleeping hours in deep, restorative sleep, which is why once your little one dozes off, it’s difficult to wake them until they’re ready to be changed or fed again.

    This is so true – in the first few months, you really can’t disturb a sleeping baby: if they want to be asleep, they seem to be able to sleep through anything (including their twin having a screeching breakdown in the neighbouring cot).

    4 Month Old Sleep

    Now that your baby is older, she is beginning to enter the adult world of sleep, which means that she will be cycling in and out of very distinct stages: deep sleep and active sleep, just like you. The problem is that your baby doesn’t know how to deal with this new sleep cycle. If you’re rocking or feeding your baby to sleep, you may find that it takes a full thirty minutes for them to be fully asleep, only to have your baby wake fussy less than fifteen minutes later. This is because your baby has a startle reflex when they enter active sleep, and it often wakes them up. If they don’t know how to get back to sleep, they look for the person who can help: mom or dad.

    That sounds so familiar! Both babies have become hugely dependent on us to help them to sleep. When we’re both here, that’s OK (not fun at times, but OK). When it’s just one of us holding the fort (me during the day, or me this evening, while Tristan’s been at the rugby), it becomes pretty much impossible. The babies went to sleep fairly easily tonight, Tristan went out, and then both babies woke up after sleeping for only 30 minutes. I tried to settle each of them in turn, but whichever one wasn’t getting the shushing and patting would screech like a banshee, disturbing the one that I was trying to settle. Eventually I conceded defeat and sent an SOS text to Sarah, our lovely neighbour. She came over for an hour and held Hattie while I cuddled and settled Joe back to sleep. Thank God for Sarah, that’s all I can say. And I hope that Tristan enjoyed the night off, because I’m afraid that it’s the last one he’ll be getting for the next few weeks…

    Eventually, I settled Hattie to sleep in the portacot in my office (it’s been there all this week, because it was becoming so difficult to settle two babies to sleep in the same room during the day – one of them would inevitably wake up after their first sleep cycle ended, 40 to 50 minutes after falling asleep, and their squawking would wake up their sibling). The good thing about settling in the portacot is that we’re still using the bassinet attachment, which enables me to rock the baby to sleep if necessary.

    As if that wasn’t stressful enough for you, your baby actually does most of her deep sleep at the beginning of the night. So while she may go to sleep for about five hours (interestingly, that is the technical definition of sleeping through the night at this stage, but many 4 month olds are capable of sleeping longer), she will begin to wake at regular intervals later in the night. This is where it gets challenging.

    That is definitely the pattern that has developed with our two little treasures. They go to bed at 6.30 pm and are usually asleep by 7 pm. Sometimes they wake up after three hours for a feed, but they’ll sometimes last until 11 pm or later before waking up. Until a few days ago, they’d then wake up no more than once through the night. For the past few nights, we’ve been woken up at least every two hours.

    And I’ve just had to resettle Hattie, after an hour’s sleep. It didn’t take much – I just rocked her in the bassinet for a couple of minutes. It’s as if she only needs me to be vaguely involved in the process, so she can relax and go back to sleep.

    Your baby is growing, the world is becoming far more interesting for them, and they have to learn to fall asleep on their own. No wonder your baby is cranky! If you’ve experienced this phase, you aren’t alone. This sleep regression should only last between two and four weeks. Any longer than that, and you have created a new schedule (and not one that you’ll want to keep).

    TWO TO FOUR WEEKS!!! As I commented to Tristan in a text message this evening, it already feels like I’ve been going through this with them for two to four years. All jokes aside, it is comforting to know that this stage will end eventually. I just hope that I live to see the day…

    Thankfully, The Sleep Lady has some advice for how to get through this tricky phase:

    7 Tips to Help You Through the 4 Month Sleep Regression

    1. Do what works.

    Remember, a lot is changing for your baby, so try to ‘go with the flow’, at least for now.

    Really, what choice do I have?

    2. Watch for your baby’s sleepy cues, and try to respond to them quickly.

    This is crucial, in my opinion. The difficulty, when you have twins, is responding quickly enough, but I do find that there’s usually a few minutes’ lag between the two babies being ready for bed, so I pounce as soon as I can, and get one settled while the other one is still happily playing on the mat. And settling the babies into different rooms for the daytime sleeps has enabled me to settle the second baby effectively, without disturbing the first baby. As of this evening I think I’m going to keep the two of them separate for night sleeps as well, and see if it helps – although Joe is definitely displaying some of the sleep regressiong signs – he’s very clingy, and much more difficult to settle than usual – Hattie’s the one who is really gripped by it at the moment.

    3. Once your baby’s fussiness begins to calm down, consider introducing ‘drowsy but awake’ at bedtime.

    This will encourage and help him learn to put himself to sleep. Stay by her side and offer physical and verbal reassurance. If she does nothing but cry for 15 minutes despite your soothing help, pick her up and rock, hold or fed her to sleep and try again the next night or whenever you both feel up to it.

    ‘Drowsy but awake’ has been our bedtime goal since we started sleep training with Hattie and Joe. We’ll shush and pat them until they’re just nodding off, and then we’ll leave them to it. But yes, sometimes you just have to concede defeat and pick that baby up for a cuddle. Before Sarah came over to help me this evening I had two inconsolably sobbing babies on my hands, and even though I know that they are absolutely fine, and won’t actually explode from crying, I don’t really want to leave them in that stage. A few minutes of grizzly ‘I’m worn out and I’m going to sleep’ crying is one thing; hardcore screeching is quite another.

    4. Be wary of creating a new sleep crutch. Go ahead and keep whatever crutch is working, but try not to lengthen the list.

    At the moment, the only ‘crutches’ we use are a white noise machine in the babies’ room, and a musical mobile:

    20130525-225809.jpg

    We stopped giving either baby a dummy in their cots quite a few weeks ago (and Joe was never particularly interested in it anyway), and I’m glad about that: one thing fewer to worry about later.

    5. Offer LOTS of additional snuggles and reassurance.

    Now that I understand more about what’s going on, I think I’ll find it easier to do this (rather than being fanatical about trying to resettle them at all costs).

    6. Watch for signs of growth.

    Yes, this is a trying time, but you’ll be amazed at all of the new discoveries that your baby will make during these weeks.

    I just hope that I’m awake to appreciate them!

    7. Follow your flexible schedule as much as possible.

    Babies thrive on consistency and routine, so be sure to provide it.

    This seems slightly oxymoronic to me, but I guess The Sleep Lady means that I should continue to try to stick to the standard ‘feed-play-sleep’ structure, even if they only sleep for 30 minutes at a time…

    And remember, this sleep regression is actually a good thing. Your baby is growing and changing. And it’s temporary; your baby will return to her longer stretches of sleep at night again. If your baby isn’t back to her sweet self in a few weeks, please consider contacting her doctor to see if there may be an underlying medical issue.

    I can’t tell you how much comfort I take from the knowledge that this situations are temporary!

    Coming soon: part two – the Wonder Weeks.

    Meltdowns

    Just in case anybody was labouring under the misapprehension that I’ve got my maternal act together, let me tell you about the dramas of the past couple of days.

    A few weeks ago I was bemoaning the difficulties of coaxing decent day time naps out of Hattie and Joe. My lovely friend Emma gently suggested that I should think about sticking close to home for a week or two, so I could learn the babies’ preferred routine and then see how to juggle their need for stability and regular sleep with my need to leave the house occasionally.

    I took Emma’s advice, and it soon became apparent that both Hattie and Joe prefer to have one or two longer sleeps in the morning and through lunch time, and if they managed to get these sleeps, they could handle the rest of the day with, perhaps, just a 30 minute or 45 minute nap later in the afternoon. On the flip side, it was clear that failing to cater for these morning sleeps would invariably result in two very grumpy and over-tired babies by the end of the day. And this would then make it more difficult to settle the two of them at night.

    The other thing that I’ve realised is that the babies work on a firm three hour feeding routine most of the time, and generally speaking they can only be awake for 90 minutes at a time before they’re ready to hit the hay again. Sometimes they need a feed after two and a half hours, or can stretch out to three and a half hours, or even four hours, and sometimes they can last for two hours of awake time, but most of the time they both start showing serious tired signs (yawning, rubbing their eyes, being grizzly, looking vacant) as the 90 minute mark approaches.

    So this was all pretty simple: stay at home until mid-afternoon, and all would be well. This puts the kibosh on going to any playgroups, ‘Mainly Music’ events, or other baby-related occasions, as they all seem to take place before lunch, but I’m sure that this inflexible need to be wedded to their cots will pass within another couple of months, and then we can get out on the playgroup circuit. And in the meantime, if I want to catch up with people I either invite them to our house in the morning, or head out to visit them in the afternoon.

    Now, taking all this sensible baby knowledge into account, you’ve got to wonder who would be idiotic enough to STILL try to take their babies out in the morning, wouldn’t you? The answer would be me, unfortunately. On Saturday, Hattie and Joe both had a mighty two and a half hour morning sleeps, waking up at 11.40 am. So we thought “Sweet! Great sleeps – we can head out”. We drove up to Matakana for lunch, and the babies caught a 30 minute nap in the car each way. They then had total meltdowns as the afternoon progressed – they were angels while we were out, but they wouldn’t have another sleep when we got home, screamed a lot (Hattie in particular), and took AGES to settle that night.

    But not content with making this mistake once, I headed out with them for a walk into the village this morning. It was a sunny day, my twin mother friend Jen was visiting with her lovely girls, and the thought of staying inside seemed crazy – I reasoned that we could get back home again before it was time for another sleep.

    Of course, things went haywire: Hattie slept for ten minutes on the way home, had a dirty nappy, couldn’t just be put to bed, had a feed, stayed up for agggges afterwards, and finally slept for nearly two hours. However, the good sleep is obviously the morning sleep, because she woke up in a foul mood. I was dealing with a very cross little Hattie all afternoon, all frowning faces and ear-piercing shrieks. Motherhood is AWESOME.

    Joe, meanwhile, has had even less sleep than Hattie today, and has remained cruisy. It’s like they’ve swapped personalities.

    Anyway, we’ve nearly finished the final feed of today, so cross your fingers for us that Hattie and Joe are just the right amount of tired to actually go to sleep easily. I promise you: I have learned my lesson and there will be no further morning activities for quite some time!

    Four months old

    Our babies are four months old! You can check out how much they’ve grown on the Hattie and Joe page, which shows their latest monkey photo. Here’s their monkey photo shoot from another angle:

     20130517-102419.jpg

    I thought that I’d start writing about what they’re actually up to – they’re at this great age now where their personalities are emerging, and having two of them means that their personal development is so obvious when compared with their sibling. It’s fascinating to watch as they learn new things each day.

    Harriet

     20130517-102607.jpg

    Hattie is such a charming, engaging little girl. She has this way of watching people until she catches their eye, and then breaking out her beautiful smile. She does it with me when I’m feeding her, in particular: I’ll become aware that she’s stopped suckling, and when I look down she’ll be lying on the tandem feeding cushion, staring up at me with an intent look on her face. As soon as we make eye contact she beams at me, and then resumes feeding. It’s adorable, and it makes me want to grab her and give her an enormous squeeze. She’s also very chipper when she’s on the change table – she grins away at me, and squirms with glee.

    It’s not all smiles with Hattie, though – she’s very happy, except for the times when she’s shrieking like a banshee. Essentially, Hattie wants what she wants, when she wants it, and she’ll scream her head off until her needs are met. This behaviour usually manifests itself concerning food. When she wakes from a nap she’ll give a squawk to let me know that she’s awake, and when I go to fetch her from her cot she’ll give me a huge smile. However, if it takes longer than a minute (literally one minute) for her feed to begin she was start making so much noise that you’d think she’d been starved for weeks. It’s quite unpleasant at times, particularly as I have to get Joe organised as well. In Hattie’s perfect world I’d have a chair right next to her cot, and she’d be plucked straight from her bed linen and put onto the boob. If this behaviour is indicative of her general personality then puberty could be an interesting time in our house.

    Hattie also gets extremely grumpy if my milk let down is faster than she wants. She screams in fury at the offending boob, and then scowls at me as if I’ve done it on purpose. And if it happens a couple of times, she goes on strike – I then have to feed her separately afterwards. She is strong willed, to put it mildly.

    And a sad Hattie is a heart rending sight: her bottom lip juts out and she wails in a seriously melodramatic manner. Fortunately, she can be cheered out of a sad moment fairly easily (it just doesn’t work when she wants to be fed, and is being delayed; then, there’s absolutely no stopping her).

    Hattie responds really well when I sing to her, and seems to be oblivious to the significant limitations of my singing voice. Whenever I start singing to her and Joe (which happens a hundred times a day – I don’t know what it is about the two of them, but I’m constantly singing), she smiles back at me before I’ve belted out the first line of any song. She seems to be particularly fond on our customised version of ‘Old McDonald Had a Farm’ (‘Joe and Hattie Had a Farm’), and I seldom get beyond the bit about them having some sheep before she’s delighted. It’s always nice to have an appreciative audience.

    During the past couple of weeks Hattie has started practising rolling around whenever she’s lying on her play mat. So far, she’s only managed to lift her legs up and roll onto her side, but she seems pretty determined, so I suspect that further rolling is not far away. She’s equally active when she’s in the bath, with her arms and legs going like windmills, and water going all over the room.

    Hattie has very sweet tired signs – she rubs her eyes and looks knackered – and she tends to go to bed very easily. She lies in her cot, one arm around Betty, her bear, and watches her mobile (and smiles at me if she catches my eye), and when the music finishes, she snuggles down and goes to sleep. Occasionally, if she’s over-tired, she might need a bit of shushing and patting to help her on her way, but usually she can settle to sleep by herself. She sometimes struggles to stay asleep past one sleep cycle, but recently I’ve learned that it’s worth trying to resettle her – she can often get back to sleep if she’s had a bit of encouragement. Sometimes it seems like she actively wants to go to sleep – you’ll see her determinedly close her eyes, often when you look over at her to see if she’s nodding off.

    Yesterday was a bit of a red letter day for Hattie: for the first time, she’s worn an entire outfit of 0 – 3 month sized clothing. Until now, she’s still been in newborn sizes. She’s quite long, but she’s so dainty – although she’s developed a fine pair of chubby cheeks in the past few weeks. She’s inherited my pale complexion, so sunscreen will play a bit part in her future. Her eye colour isn’t clear yet, although I think they’ll be green or hazel. A couple of people who know my family well have said that she reminds them of her Gogga, my mother, and a lot of people think that she looks like me – it’s the paleness, I think, and also the oval face shape. I also think that she might inherit my family’s tendency for red hair (from the paternal side), which would be brilliant as far as I’m concerned: I love red hair. Actually, I wonder if there’s a touch of my lovely Nanna in Hattie? Charming, sociable, somewhat volatile, fond of a drink, and with red hair…

    Joseph

     20130517-102716.jpg

    Joe is a chilled out and very sweet little boy. He spends a lot of his time sitting there and gazing around him, taking everything in – he’s been like that since he was a newborn. He took a lot longer than Hattie to begin smiling, and he still reserves most of his smiles for me, but I am treated to them on a constant basis. It’s lovely: he has a gorgeous shy smile that starts slowly and then spreads across his entire face, and then he squirms with delight, as if his entire body is smiling as well. The rest of the world, Tristan included, doesn’t get to see as much of Joe’s smile at the moment, but I think it’s just because he tends to take a little longer to warm up to people (whereas Hattie wants the world to smile at her early on). I’d been told by many people that baby boys often develop incredibly strong relationships with their mothers, and it does seem to be true. Joe loves to be carried by me, and he snuggles in like a baby koala. In his perfect world he’d be an only child, I think.

    Joe doesn’t really get upset very often, but when he does it’s quite comical: his face completely crumples, and turns bright red – we call it his squashed tomato face. Hattie’s hang-up is being hungry; Joe’s hang-up is being tired. Invariably his meltdowns occur when it’s been too long between naps, and can usually be remedied if he can be persuaded to go to sleep. He’s one of those babies that always has a bit of a grizzle before he nods off, and before we sussed this out and embarked on our sleep training, this was a bit of an issue: we’d try to get him calm and happy before going to bed, but everything we did would just tire him out even more and make matters worse. Now, we’ve accepted that he’ll start complaining when we swaddle him, and that his grumpy face will register his displeasure when we lie him down in the cot. He almost always needs at least a couple of minutes of shushing and patting, but once he settles down and goes to sleep, he tends to sleep very well. In the past couple of days I’ve experimented with separating him and Hattie for daytime sleeps (so I can properly resettle them if they wake up too early, without the other baby being disturbed), and Joe’s been in the portacot in my office. This is working out well because he’s napping in the bassinet attachment, which can be rocked – he seems to like it, and goes to sleep pretty quickly.

    Joe’s always been an easy feeder, although he can’t handle my turbo boob, and even on my slower boob he often needs to be burped half-way through a meal. He’s also been quite spilly recently, although I’m hoping that this will settle down again as my dairy consumption is vastly reduced. At the end of a feed he gives me the loveliest smiles, for all the world like he’s saying thank you for such a tasty snack!

    When I sing to the babies Joe gives me the most adorable smile of recognition with each new song, but he’s definitely more focussed on the visual elements of entertainment – he responds most strongly to songs with actions (like ‘Incy Wincy Spider’), or my facial expressions as I’m singing (he likes ‘Oranges and Lemons’ because I put on a different voice, and a corresponding silly face, for each bell). When I read the two of them stories he’s the one who really seems to be looking at each page, whereas Hattie’s gaze will wander around the room. He’s also obsessed with the TV, and if I want him to focus on anything else I have to turn it off, or else his eyes slide away from whatever we’re doing and check out the screen instead, even if it’s muted.

    Joe’s relaxed nature currently extends to most activities. When I put him down on the play mat he’ll do a bit of half-hearted wriggling, but he’s nowhere near as motivated as Hattie (who will practise rolling onto her side over and over again). Similarly, when Joe’s in the bath he lies back and looks like he’s just waiting for somebody to bring him a snack.

    Developmentally, he’s definitely got the jump on his sister when it comes to verbal skills. He’s been babbling away for at least a couple of weeks, and is positively chatty at times. I’m ruthlessly hot-housing him in this regard, and saying ‘mum-mum-mum-mum’ to him in a bid to influence his first word selection (but I bet it will end up being ‘da’, ‘Tui’, or ‘no’!)

    Joe is significantly bigger than Hattie, and has been wearing 0 – 3 month clothing for quite a while. He’s such a cuddly baby, with lovely plump cheeks, chunky little arms and legs, and a nice round tummy. At the moment I’m envisaging him on the side of a scrum one day. He has the most beautiful olive skin, which he’s inherited from Tristan. He’s also got Tristan’s lips, and gorgeous big hazel eyes. I think that he’s likely to have blond hair, at least as a child – again, just like his Daddy. Although some people think that he resembles me, I think he’s much more like Tristan’s side of the family; we definitely see glimpses of his Nanna (Tristan’s mother, Pat) in him.

    Enough maternal gushing!

    Happy Joe

    Feeling very chipper in his bouncy chair this morning:

    20130516-094416.jpg

    20130516-094431.jpg

    20130516-094444.jpg

    20130516-094502.jpg

    20130516-094514.jpg

    20130516-094527.jpg

    Thanks for the mammaries

    Given how much of my time and energy is spent feeding Hattie and Joe, I thought that I should write a post to talk about how we’ve been getting on. I last wrote about feeding in late January, when the babies were nearly two weeks old.  I  wrote primarily about my realisation that, despite my pre-birth pragmatism regarding breast feeding, I’d realised how important it was to me to be able to feed my children – I hadn’t anticipated that breast feeding would be such a good bonding experience.  I also wrote about being happy that both babies had learned to latch on so easily, and I mentioned that I was supplementing with formula.

    For the avoidance of doubt, what follows is entirely my own breast feeding ‘journey’: it is not designed to in any way suggest that breast is best, or any of that lactivist nonsense – as long as a baby is being fed, that baby is going to do well, and no mother should feel any pressure to breast feed – indeed, mothers should do it for a day, a week, a month, a year, or not at all: it is entirely their businesss.  Like I said in my earlier breast feeding post, if you’re not the one holding the yowling baby at 2 am you have absolutely no right to an opinion, as far as I’m concerned.  I’m writing this post primarily because I’ve been told that some people can’t fathom what it must be like to feed two babies, or even imagine that it’s possible, so I thought it might be interesting to lift the curtain on it, so to speak.

    As I mentioned in my earlier post, Hattie and Joe latched on in the post-op recovery room, and for the first couple of days we jogged along quite well, with me tandem feeding them most of the time.  Every now and then a lactation consultant would appear in my room and ask how we were getting on, and I’d cheerily reply that we were fine, and they’d then congratulate us and continue on their way.  In hindsight, I’ve realised that both they and I were at fault: I shouldn’t have tried to appear so competent (particularly given that I didn’t actually know what I was doing); and they should have actually checked what was going on, and not just taken my morphine-addled and totally ignorant word for it.  The upshot was that my milk was very slow to arrive (blame my horrendous birth experience), the babies lost a bit too much weight (and it was very marginal – they lost 11% of their body weight, and anything  below a 10% loss is considered absolutely normal and fine), and suddenly it was all a mad panic, with midwives freaking out and telling us that we’d have to supplement with formula.  They said this almost like they were suggesting something profane, but we were absolutely fine with it and were willing to do whatever was required.  The answer came in the form of the Lactaid system, which involves breast feeding while wearing nipple shields.  A very thin tube is also fed into the nipple shield, and formula is fed to the baby via the tube: the idea is that the baby gets the extra nourishment it needs, but without having to given a bottle) – as far as the baby is concerned, it’s still being breast fed.

    The Lactaid system worked well for us for the 36 hours that we used it, although it was definitely a two person job – whenever the babies were due a feed I’d have to ring for a midwife to come and help me, and they’d bring the formula with them.  It did the trick – the babies gained back the weight that they’d lost – but it obviously wasn’t going to be a good long term solution, so for the last day or two of our time in hospital we supplemented the feeds with formula out of a bottle.  We spent a day in hospital supplementing with bottles, and then realised that it was a tremendous faff – washing bottles, sterilising them, preparing them – and that doing that by myself was going to be a major challenge overnight, so we were discharged that day and took our feeding regime home.

    And man, what a regime it was!  The lactation consultant wrote up a plan for us that involved three-hourly feeds, each of which involved three courses: a breast feed; a bottle of expressed breast milk; and a bottle of formula.  After we’d got through all of that, and burped the babies (which is bloody time-consuming with little babies), it would then be time for them to go back to bed, and then I’d have to express milk to use for the next feed.  This left me between an hour and 90 minutes before it would be time to wake the babies for the next feed.  It was madness, I tell you – madness!  It did the trick, though – the babies gained back the weight they’d lost, and then we were faced with the challenge of when and how to modify the regime.  The lactation consultant hadn’t left much in the way of guidance regarding this – perhaps she thought that we’d continue it until Hattie and Joe left home? – but we worked with our midwife and eventually removed the expressed milk component and kept on with the formula top-ups.

    We continued with a three hourly feeding schedule, which included waking up the babies for feeds at night.  That all went well until the babies were nearly three weeks old, at which point they suddenly went completely and utterly mental, crying all the time and wanting to feed incessantly.  I had NO idea what was going on and what to do: my only way of dealing with it was to breast feed them far more often.  I also googled like a mad googling thing and discovered, for the first time, all about growth spurts.  And I was pretty bloody annoyed that nobody had warned me about them – the stupid antenatal teacher, for example!  I guess that people who are demand feeding their newborns might not notice them, but if you’re feeding to a schedule, like I was, that first one is very obvious.  Anyway, I fed and fed and fed and fed, and eventually – after a couple of days – things settled down again.

    In those early weeks Joe fed very easily, but Hattie had the most incredibly painful latch – I described it in that earlier post about breast feeding as feeling like a barracuda attacking me.  I fed her with a nipple shield nearly all of the time, because I just couldn’t handle the pain of having her latch on directly.  And I found it physically exhausting to breast feed.  Tristan would often look over at me in the evening and find me nodding off, or fully asleep, while feeding (one of the reasons why I was so reluctant to feed in bed).  And I was hungry and thirsty all the time.

    I was keen to end the formula supplements – partly because it was such a pain in the neck to have to sort out bottles, and partly because, if I was going to breast feed, I wanted to see if I could solely breast feed.  It just didn’t seem to make sense to me to be endlessly giving the babies two forms of nourishment.  I liked the fact that I could breast feed, but I also struggled with the idea that I didn’t really know how much milk the babies were getting.  I did ramp up the formula supplements for one week in particular, and saw a correspondingly good weight gain from both babies – did that mean that I should just knock the breast feeding on the head entirely and switch to formula?  I really didn’t know what to do.

    When faced with baby-related confusion, I tend to turn to the network of twin mothers that I have formed in the past year.  On Facebook, in particular, I’m lucky enough to be able to access the advice of a huge number of very smart women, so I asked one group about how I should proceed.  Was I better off continuing to supplement after most feeds, like I had been doing?  Or should I drop the breast feeding and switch to formula full time?  Or would I be best off breast feeding one baby and formula feeding the other (as my Plunket nurse had suggested as an option)?  If I expressed milk more often, would it increase my supply?  I didn’t even think that exclusively breast feeding was an option, because I feared that I wouldn’t have enough milk.  From hospital onwards I’d been on a medication called domperidone, which helps to promote milk supply.  I was really reluctant to even consider stopping it, in case I had no milk at all without it.

    Anyway, this great group of twin mothers responded to my cries for help by suggesting ways to juggle formula and breast milk.  In addition, a couple of respondents asked if I wanted to keep breast feeding and give up formula entirely.   Yes, I replied, so they told me how to do it: demand feed, to build up my milk supply.  No formula for a weekend: just breast milk, given to the babies as often as they wanted it, with no thought of a schedule.  I was advised to stop thinking about my breast milk as the stock in a factory – a finite supply, in other words – and to consider it more like a production line: there would always be more milk.  They pointed out that babies are far more effective than breast pumps when it comes to draining a breast, and so they were the best ‘tool’ I had available to me.  So the advice was simple: spend a weekend doing absolutely nothing but eating, sleeping, and breast feeding.

    It made sense, but it was such a daunting prospect after demand feeding through that knackering three week growth spurt!  As luck would have it, we had a session with Sharlene just before the potential demand feeding weekend, so I asked her for her advice about building up supply.  Her take was totally different: she felt that demand feeding twins would be too exhausting, and that I would be better off expressing a lot for two or three days (like, every couple of hours during the day).  So I REALLY didn’t know what to do, with two conflicting opinions: one from a baby whisperer, and one from other twin mothers.

    As it turned out, the decision was taken out of my hands when Hattie and Joe hit the six week growth spurt that very weekend.  Saturday morning was normal, we went out for brunch in the middle of the day, we got home at 2ish, and then both babies went stark raving mad and did absolutely nothing but grizzle and feed until late on Sunday night.  I could have supplemented with formula to take some of the strain, but it seemed silly to do so when this was my golden opportunity to try to bolster my supply once and for all, so I gritted my teeth, ate a lot of snacks, and just went for it.

    A couple of days after the growth spurt was over my boobs were enormous and uncomfortable, but then things settled down a bit.  I continued to give the babies some formula supplements – Hattie, in particular, and late at night for both babies, but I was becoming more confident that my supply was starting to match their demand.

    Joe was gaining weight well, but Hattie was still pretty tiny.  I’d pumped her up with formula for one week, but now I wanted to nourish her more effectively with breast milk.  My Plunket nurse pointed out that feeding her with the nipple shield was less effective than having her latch on directly, so if I could, I should ditch the shields and go for it.  And so I gave it a whirl, and oh my GOD the pain.  The best description of the feeling of a painful latch – the description that countless women have used – is ‘toe curlingly painful’, and it really is accurate.  I was having to psyche myself up for each feed, which was fairly awful.

    My Plunket nurse also suggested that I spend some time with the lactation consultant at the local Plunket Parents’ Centre, so I rang and booked the babies and myself in.  The lactation consultant couldn’t see me for a week, so I continued to try to feed without the nipple shield.  Eventually, I had to concede defeat and put it back on, though – the pain was just too much.

    I went to see the lactation consultant more with hope than expectation.  When we arrived Hattie and Joe were due a nap, so they had a sleep while I watched a DVD that explained the mechanics of breast feeding… and I realised that, although I’d thought that I’d understood how to latch on a baby well, I really wasn’t doing it properly.  Joe was managing a reasonably decent latch more by luck than good judgement, and Hattie wasn’t managing it at all.  My self-diagnosis was that she wasn’t taking the nipple far enough into her mouth, so it was pressing against her hard palate and the front of her mouth (excruiating for more, and totally ineffective as a way of getting milk), rather than having the nipple press against the soft palate at the back of her mouth (which would then mean that she’d be putting pressure on my milk ducts with every swallow).  The babies woke up, the lactation consultant sat with me, I latched them on in the manner suggested in the DVD – ‘rolling’ the nipple down into the baby’s mouth – and lo and behold, we managed it.  For the first time in her eight and a half weeks of life I was able to feed Hattie comfortably.  Yay!

    One side effect of the improved latch for both babies was their ability to feed much more quickly.  This meant that they could take in a greater volume of milk, which was excellent from the whole ‘gaining weight’ perspective, but it also meant that they were suddenly guzzling milk and, at times, half-choking on it.  Hattie was a good guzzler and could cope quite well, but Joe would frequently end up coughing and spluttering, and literally dripping with milk.  Up until this point I’d swapped the babies and boobs for each feed, but it soon became clear that my right boob was my ‘turbo boob’, with a really fast let-down – Joe just couldn’t handle it.  Ever since, he’s been allocated my left boob and Hattie’s in charge of my right boob. Hopefully this won’t lead to me having a totally uneven rack after I’ve weaned them.

    When the babies were around ten weeks old we found that they no longer wanted a formula top-up.  At this point we’d pretty much reduced the top-ups back to one small bottle with their last feed of the evening, but we kept making it and they kept refusing it.  The bottle was offered after their breast feed, and they would be too sleepy after coming off the boob to drink anything else.  So we stopped offering it, and Hattie and Joe have been officially exclusively breast fed ever since.

    The great news is that my supply has been ample, and that both babies have been growing at a good rate: they’d each gained a kilogram in the four weeks between two weigh-ins.  The other barometers for breast fed babies – whether they’re producing plenty of wet and dirty nappies, and whether they’re generally happy and settled – continue to reassure me that I can actually feed my two babies.  I’m not going to lie: it’s a weirdly satisfying feeling.  I hadn’t really thought about it too much, but when I said something about breast feeding yesterday, Tristan pointed out that I’d worked very hard to get to the point where I could feed them myself.  I guess that I have been reluctant to give up, and I really have no idea why I’ve been so bloody-minded about it.  My initial long term aim was to breast feed for the first six months, but I’m now thinking that I’ll push on for a full year.  My body has totally adjusted to the demands being placed on it now – I don’t even find myself getting particularly knackered.

    There are still challenges, though.  I’d continued with the domperidone because, again, I was paranoid about not producing enough milk.  However, I’d started getting blocked milk ducts on Joe’s side, which is generally a sign that you’re not fully draining the breast – that supply is outstripping demand, in other words.  I mentioned this to my Plunket nurse and she suggested that I give up domperidone, so I’ve gradually weaned myself off it.  I’ve gradually had fewer blocked ducts, thank goodness – they are really painful and very unpleasant.

    My other main challenge is Joe’s newfound refusal to drink from a bottle.  When both babies gave up that final formula feed I didn’t think twice about ensuring that they would still accept a bottle when required (for example, if I want to be away from them for more than three hours, and Tristan wants to give them some expressed milk) – I assumed that, because they’d been fine with drinking from both a bottle and the breast in the past, they’d retain the knack.  Sadly, I was mistaken!  I went to a gig a couple of weeks ago, and tried the babies on a bottle beforehand, only to discover that Hattie the guzzler would happily receive her breast milk in that way, but Joe wouldn’t have a bar of it – he pushed the teat out of his mouth and cried in dismay.  He wouldn’t take it from me, or from either of my neighbours.  Tristan tried again with him a few days later, and still had no luck.  We really need to tackle this issue again, but we’ll have to make sure that a) Joe’s really hungry, and b) I’m nowhere to be seen.

    One additional challenge: Joe has been very ‘spilly’ in the past couple of weeks, up-chucking partially digested milk that smells foul and resembles cottage cheese.  When I described this to my Plunket nurse last week she immediately declared that it’s a sign of his inability to cope with the amount of dairy products I eat.  I do scoff a lot of yoghurt, milk, ice cream, butter, and cheese, so I suppose that this isn’t too surprising – he’s not allergic (or else he’d be projectile vomiting), but he must be at least slightly intolerant.  This means that I’ll definitely have to stick with breast feeding for Joe’s first year, as most formulas are dairy-based and will almost certainly cause him similar problems.  To remedy the problem, I’ve almost entirely given up dairy products – I’m having milk in my tea, and a bit of butter on my breakfast toast, but that’s pretty much it. I’m also continuing to avoid caffeine and alcohol while I breast feed. Giving up dairy products feels harder than doing with out a can of Coke or a vodka and tonic!

    I suppose there’s one last challenge of exclusively breast feeding: I have to do it every three hours during the day, and usually at least once overnight.  There’s no way to pass on this job – I am essential!  And with breast fed babies there isn’t much prospect of stretching the feeding schedule out to four hours so quickly, because they digest the milk so quickly.  Sometimes, when they’re particularly hungry, I’m feeding every two hours or two and a half hours (Hattie is such a screamer if she decides that she’s hungry – trust me, nobody could wait it out and resist her).  Life is pretty relentless when you’re at the beck and call of your babies, 24/7.

    But these are all minor quibbles, and should all be fixable in the fullness of time.  The positives far outweigh the benefits, and aside from pragmatic benefits like not having to spend money on formula or spend time washing bottles, the main advantage for me is still the bonding element of breast feeding.  I still do 95% of Hattie and Joe’s feeds on the tandem feeding pillow, and while those tiny peach fuzz heads have grown substantially since I wrote my earlier breast feeding post, the bonding experience provided by feeding my children has only intensified.  These days, Hattie and Joe often reach out to clasp hands while they’re feeding, which is a sight that would surely melt the hardest heart.  And although Hattie still screams like a banshee if her feed is delayed by as much as a whole minute, and then vibrates with impatience while waiting for me to undo my bra, she makes up for this imperious pre-feed misbehaviour by being absolutely adorable after she’s finished – she invariably drinks more quickly than Joe, and then lies on her side of the cushion, beaming with joy when she looks up at me.  The urge to scoop her up and shower her with kisses is one that I can rarely resist.  And Joe’s equally adorable – he tends to lie there sleepily at the start of the feed, beaming at me and looking like he can’t believe his luck.

    No post about breast feeding is complete without an action shot, so here you go:

    8 weeks 006

    Oh – and I’ve already warned Tristan that I am planning a boozy weekend away with friends as soon as the babies are weaned! I think I will have earned it by then…

    Delusions of adequacy

    It’s a funny thing, this motherhood game. Before Hattie and Joe were born I was convinced that I was a pragmatic, level-headed woman, old enough and confident enough to avoid getting drawn into the horrible spirit-sucking spiral of maternal guilt that seems to afflict so many people. It just goes to show how foolish I was: nobody escapes the occasional feeling that, despite your best efforts, you’re a terrible parent.

    I had organised a follow-up session with Sharlene Poole because I was at my wit’s end after a prolonged bout of demand feeding from my darling daughter, who was seemingly determined to reduce her mother to a hollowed out husk of a woman. Events reached a head on Sunday night, when she and her brother tag-teamed all night and had me up six or seven times: I emailed Sharlene and asked if she could come and see me, to work on routines and settling. Of course, sod’s law always dictates that you start feeling better as soon as you make an appointment to see a doctor – it turns out that similar forces are at play when it comes to consultations with baby whisperers. Hattie and Joe started sleeping much better, and Hattie’s feeding frenzy calmed down; we were back to a three hourly feeding schedule.

    When Sharlene turned up on Friday we tackled the main issue: a lack of decent daytime sleeps. Hattie, in particular, is very reluctant to sleep for longer than 45 minutes – roughly one sleep cycle. She obviously sleeps through several sleep cycles at night, so I was at a loss to understand why she couldn’t, or wouldn’t, do so during the day. Joe is a better daytime sleeper and will often sleep for up to two and a half hours, but Hattie will disturb him if she’s in the room and wakes up.

    Sharlene said that she thought the babies needed to be awake and occupied for longer – that they’ve transitioned out of the ‘tiny baby’ stage and now need to have some stimulation in their lives, and be up for a couple of hours at a time. In other words, the babies are bored. Of course, it doesn’t help that the signs of boredom (yawning, glazed look in the eyes) are exactly the same as the signs of tiredness. Can you imagine how annoyed you’d be if you were just a bit bored, and somebody responded by trying to bundle you off to bed? But how is an inexperienced parent meant to differentiate between the two states? If I just had one baby I suppose I might be able to examine their tiny face so exhaustively that I could interpret their every expression, but seriously – SERIOUSLY – how does any twin mother manage to do it?

    Sharlene also thought that we should be stretching out the gap between feeds to up to four hours. She recommended that I move the babies on to her stage three routine, and I said that I’d give it a go and report back.

    Now, this was all perfectly innocuous and helpful advice, but it really made me feel a bit rubbish – like I hadn’t been doing a good job of catering to my babies’ changing needs. I mean, I feel like I’ve only just got to grips with providing the basic necessities of life, particularly on my own for the most part, and now you’re telling me that my babies are bored rigid and need me to morph into some kind of entertainment director and events manager? How the hell am I supposed to find the time and energy to do that, when ensuring that two babies are fed, clothed, not sitting in their own filth, and occasionally put to bed is enough to run me ragged?

    And the thing is, playing with the babies is the fun bit, right? This is why we have kids; to interact with them and see them discover new things. Is it wrong that it just felt like somebody had doubled my work load? It felt like I was just starting to gain a bit of confidence in my ability to be a good mother, and now the expectations had changed and I was failing to meet them.

    As Friday progressed (and it wasn’t a good day – the babies were out of sync and I hardly had a minute without at least one of them awake and needing my attention), I tried to take a breath and accept that their needs change and that my role has to adapt accordingly. As I so often do these days, I turned to the amazing community of twin mothers that I’ve met since becoming pregnant, and asked the members of the North Shore Multiple Birth Club for suggestions of how to entertain babies that are old enough to be bored, but not yet old enough to actually play with anything. They responded with some brilliant ideas – I’ll list them in a separate post soon, in case anybody else finds them helpful. The most helpful thing, as always, was the reassurance that other people had coped with this situation successfully, and that I would too.

    Over the weekend we made a concerted effort to stick to the new routine, to see if it would result in more sleep. So far, it hasn’t really worked, and although I was going to continue trying today, I’ve since decided to revert back to the earlier routine, and try changing things again in another week or two.

    I’m also not convinced that the babies are ready for a longer feeding schedule. Admittedly, I’m basing this primarily on Hattie’s marked tendency to shriek like a fire alarm if she isn’t fed promptly, and she may not really need to be fed every three hours, but what should I do? Listen to her screech the house down for an extra half an hour, just to demonstrate my control over her? What is achieved by doing that, other than a grumpy baby and, for me, the risk of throwing myself off the balcony in order to be free of the noise?

    Despite being unable to change the daytime sleeping patterns in any meaningful way, we did incorporate a lot of play into Hattie and Joe’s day, and it was fun for all of us. We read stories, sang songs, danced around (MTV played a countdown of 1990s dance anthems, which was brilliant) and put the babies into all sorts of stimulating scenarios: in their bouncy chairs, facing a mirror, under the baby gym, on a towel having a spot of nappy-free time, and checking out the world from the front packs and pram while walking Tui on the beach. Hattie and Joe responded with smiles, giggles and gurgles.

    The one other great development of recent times is the babies’ newfound ability/interest to sleep through the night. During the past week we’ve had four excellent nights:

    1. last Monday they slept from 7.25 pm to 10.30 pm, had a feed, and then slept from 11.05 pm to 6.15 am
    2. last Tuesday they slept from 6.45 pm to 3.50 am, had a feed, and then slept from 4.10 am to 7.05 am
    3. last Friday they slept from 8.20 pm to 5.15 am, had a feed, and then slept from 5.40 am until 7 am
    4. last night they slept from 7.15 pm to 11.15 pm, had a feed, and then slept from 11.35 pm to 4.50 am

    This improved night sleeping is fantastic – Tristan and I are both getting our evenings back, and getting a decent amount of uninterrupted sleep overnight, which is certainly improving my ability to cope if they don’t sleep as much during the day. My focus now is to try to get them sleeping for a decent stretch at a time in their cots for day sleeps, but to be honest I’ll happily accept sleep anywhere: as I’ve been writing this they’ve been asleep on the tandem feeding pillow, for one hour and nine minutes (and counting):

    20130429-111251.jpg

    This pins me to the sofa and renders me immobile except for my thumbs, but at the moment it feels like a small price to pay. They’re asleep! During the day! YES!!!

    And something else has been confirmed for me: if I’m on hand to soothe Hattie when she starts waking up at the end of her sleep cycle (by gently stoking her head, in this instance), she’ll go back to sleep. So, if I could just sit next to her cot all the time and stand by for action, we’d be sorted. May I could train Tui to stroke Hattie’s head for me?

    So, yes: ‘babies’ needs change and mother feels like a failure because of it SHOCK!’ This parenting thing is definitely the most emotionally taxing job I’ve ever had.

    Adventures in sleep training

    A couple of weeks ago, during the first day of our stay with my parents, I was reading the excellent Nigel Latta book ‘Politically incorrect parenting’ and came to the chapter about teaching babies how to develop good sleeping habits. After I read it, I started thinking about our own approach to Hattie and Joe’s sleeping habits (which could charitably be described as laissez-faire) and realised that it was high time that we stopped buggering around and started ensuring that our babies got a bit more sleep. Regular readers may recall that I’ve recently made a decision to follow a routine again, after our days had become increasing unstructured, so I figured that improving the babies’ sleep habits would probably make life even easier. In particular, I knew that Joe was still getting insufficient sleep, and that this was making him a grumpy boy. He’s just like his mother: I’m a bit of a nightmare when I’m overtired. Hattie, on the other hand, is like her father and gets grumpy when she’s hungry.

    Knowing that you should do something is quite different from actually doing it, of course. As Nigel says in his book, “there is no way around the fact that the road to good sleep is paved with tears”. And I still had an issue with leaving my babies to cry. At this point regular readers will be remembering how I recently ‘discovered’ that babies cry without being irreparably harmed, but I’m afraid that I hadn’t fully taken on board the message (because I’m an idiot). I’d been infected by the insidious theories of attachment parents who told me that I’d actually harm my children by leaving them to cry. Even though I knew that my wise friends were right, I didn’t keep following their advice, and I kept picking up Hattie and Joe as soon as they made a sound. Like I said, I’m an idiot.

    Thankfully for me, Nigel addressed this very issue:

    I know that there is very vocal group of parenting enthusiasts who believe it actually is very bad for children to cry. I regularly get emails from some of them in fact. Often these people will quote the ‘attachment parenting research’ and explain very seriously the ‘damaging effect of cortisol on the developing brain’. They will say that crying babies show elevated levels of the ‘stress hormone’ cortisol and that this can have far-ranging effects on the growing brain.

    All of which sounds a bit scary really, doesn’t it?

    Well, like most times when people start using ‘science’ to justify their position, you’ll find that almost all of these people have sourced their ‘science’ from the internet and haven’t read the actual science directly themselves. Instead, they’re relying on someone else’s reading of the science posted on some bulletin board, or they’ve read a book written by other like-minded people who have themselves selectively interpreted the science to back up their argument.

    I’m not going to go into a long discourse on the science of crying and children here – I’ll save that for another time – but let me just say this: I have read the science directly myself, the actual science in actual scientific journals. My unreserved view after reading all of it is that crying, in and of itself, never hurt anyone. Children are undeniably hurt from chronic neglect – such as the children raised in the horrific conditions of Romanian orphanages, where babies were left in cots with no human interaction at all – but that’s not we’re talking about here. Neglect very clearly hurts children, but a few tears at bedtime are not quite on a par with growing up in a Romanian orphanage.

    At this point I reflected that Joe had started crying on my shoulder for at least ten minutes every night, before settling down and being put to bed: in effect, he was ‘crying it out’ on me. Clearly, my presence made absolutely no difference to him, and didn’t comfort him or prevent his crying at all. However, his crying presence on my shoulder made a significant difference to me: it wound me up and made me stressed and upset, which coloured my whole evening. Much as I love Joe, it seemed bonkers that we were engaging with each other in this way.

    Nigel’s paragraphs also made me ponder why I was paying attention to the views of a group of parents with which I held few common views. If you’re not familiar with the attachment parenting philosophy, let me enlighten you: in theory, attachment parenting involves an approach that values empathy and connection, aiming to raise children without recourse to violence, and with a great emphasis placed on dignity and respect. That all sounds fantastic, and I doubt that anybody would argue with it as a concept, but in practice it looks a little different. Those who practise attachment parenting have strong views on a number of issues:

    • childbirth should be a natural, drug-free experience.
    • children should be breast fed, and weaning should be child-led.
    • co-sleeping should be practised, which either involves the family sleeping in the same room, or in the same bed.
    • children should not be disciplined physically.
    • children should always be treated with dignity and respect.
    • modern medicine should be avoided, and natural remedies should be used wherever possible.
    • childhood vaccinations should be avoided (the belief is that the possible after effects of the vaccinations themselves are too dangerous to mitigate the risk of the illnesses that they prevent).
    • children should never be left to cry.
    • children should benefit from constant, close contact with their primary caregiver (baby-wearing, in other words).

    Now, I wholeheartedly embrace some of the attachment parenting principles – for example, we will not smack our children, and I’d hope that everybody would treat their children with dignity and respect. And I’m sure that many people agree about the benefits of breast feeding, and of the importance of close contact with their children.

    However, the attachment parents lose me when they become too extreme with their views. For example, I don’t support breast feeding by telling people who choose to formula-feed their babies that formula is akin to poison. And I don’t think that somebody is a neglectful mother if they refuse to have their infant strapped to them 24/7. And I happily embrace the many wonders of modern medicine – unlike many attachment parenting supporters, I don’t believe that almost every ailment can be cured by either breast milk or coconut oil. And I think that the purpose of childbirth is to produce a healthy infant without damaging the mother – it’s not an ‘experience’, in my opinion; it’s a means to an end. And my opinion about vaccinations is fairly clear-cut: I believe that those who don’t vaccinate their children are careless about the welfare of their offspring, and are also terribly lacking in basic social responsibility. And I think that co-sleeping sounds hellish – it must do your sex life with your spouse no good at all, for starters (and attachment parenting people regularly tell would-be co-sleepers that, if Dad rolling on the little one is a worry, Dad could sleep on the sofa instead – never mind that most people quite like to sleep with their spouses), and I don’t think that I’d sleep well with three other people in the bed, all breathing funny and farting in the dead of the night.

    And I’ve just realised that I have a deep-seated unease about attachment parenting as a concept because many of its elements – constant breast feeding, constant baby wearing, sleeping practices that prevent anybody from getting much rest – actively conspire to make the primary caregiver (the mother, in 99.99% of attachment parenting cases) entirely enslaved to her role as a parent, with absolutely no option of having a moment to herself, let alone combining motherhood with a fulfilling career. That doesn’t sit well with me.

    Anyway, Nigel’s words made me reflect on how little I really agreed with attachment parenting as it is currently practised, and that made me realise that I didn’t have to believe their views that I would be torturing my children if they cried in their cots for a few minutes. It may sound a bit stupid, but letting go of this attitude was very liberating. With this new-found confidence in the merits of common sense over doctrine, I had a chat with Tristan about Nigel’s approach to sleep training. We decided to give it a go, right then and there, with bedtime that day. I mentioned this on Facebook and a friend wondered whether we might be better off delaying it until we were back home and the babies were in familiar surroundings, but I knew that the time was right to give it a go. There were three main reasons why:

    1. We were in a big house, so we could get some physical distance from the crying (because nobody likes to listen to their baby crying);
    2. We were both on holiday, so we could handle some disruption, and there was one of us per child for resettling purposes (I’m quite sure that our efforts would have failed early on if I’d had to apply the sleep training principles unaided); and
    3. I wanted Joe to get more sleep and for all of us to have a nice, relaxing holiday – Tristan and I included. After nearly 12 weeks of having our evenings totally dominated by ever-grizzly, over-tired children who wouldn’t settle, it was time to get things sorted.

    This is the plan we followed, as recommended by Nigel and in his words, aside from my square bracket comments:

    1. Go through your normal bedtime routine. [Routine helps babies and small children to know that bedtime is fast approaching. Our bedtime routine is now set in stone: feed at 5.30ish, baths at 6ish, top-up feeds straight afterwards (if required), cuddles and bed.]
    2. Settle your wee one down into bed with much quiet cooing, soothing murmurs and the like.
    3. Quietly retreat.
    4. When the crying starts (and it will), wait five minutes before you go back. [When you're listening to crying, one minute sounds like ten! We time these crying periods with our phones, so we don't throw in the towel prematurely.]
    5. When you do go back into the room, do not make eye contact or talk. Simply pat or rock them until things settle, then exit again. [We've been using Sharlene Poole's shush/pat settling technique when we resettle.]
    6. Wait for six minutes after the crying starts before you go back in.
    7. Repeat the cycle, gradually increasing the time between visits until sleep ensues.
    8. Collapse into a chair, emotionally exhausted, and worry about whether or not your child will grow up feeling unloved and neglected, then read step 9.
    9. No, they won’t.

    Gentle reader, this sleep training malarkey works a treat. For our first couple of attempts we had to endure a few crying spells (during one memorable afternoon nap on the second day, Joe made it to a mighty ten minutes of crying, and when he was at nine minutes Hattie started up, so we were at five minutes with her… once again, twins make things immeasurably more complicated), but for the most part we had to resettle the babies no more than once or twice. Now, nearly two weeks later, Joe – always the less easy one to put to bed – will sometimes grizzle for a couple of minutes before drifting off to sleep, but as often as not a bit of immediate shushing and patting when put into his cot will enable him to settle straight away. Hattie took to it all very easily, particularly after we followed some more of Nigel’s advice and eliminated unnecessary ‘props’ – in her case, her dummy. She definitely didn’t need her dummy in order to sleep, but we were often giving it to her anyway, and then having her wake up and crying when it fell out. By not giving it to her in the first place she fell asleep just as easily, and stayed asleep.

    The hardest part of the process was dealing with the sound of our babies crying. In the first couple of days we rewarded ourselves with chocolate every time we stuck to our guns and didn’t succumb to the urge to go into their room early and grab them when they were making a racket. We also made liberal use of the mute button on our baby monitor – we switch it to mute when we start timing a crying session, and then turn the sound back on to reassess the situation when the time is up. However, our monitor is very judgemental and likes to give us a bit of a hard time – if the crying reaches a certain pitch it will beep at us in a disapproving manner, as if to say “I know that you don’t want to hear them cry, but they’re really upset now!”

    We’ve also followed some advice from other sleep experts and introduced a bedtime toy for each baby: Joe has Larry the lion, and Hattie has Betty the bear. The idea behind this that, as they both get older (Hattie and Joe, that is – Larry and Betty are ageless), they’ll associate their toys with snuggling down and going to sleep. Of course, they’re still swaddled at the moment and can’t really cuddle them, but we’ve had some sweet baby and lion/bear interaction during afternoon naps:

    20130417-170346.jpg

    20130417-170408.jpg

    We use our sleeping technique at the start of every sleep now, including daytime naps. It’s meant that we now get the babies into bed by 7.30 each night, and often a bit earlier, and they don’t tend to wake up for their first feed until after midnight, which is wonderful. It’s doing wonders for us to have our evenings back, and the babies are so much happier and more settled now that they’re getting a lot of sleep. We’re also noticing that they can self-settle without our help now. While I’ve been writing this both babies have been asleep – Hattie on a cushion on the sofa, and Joe in his cot. I heard Joe stir about 90 minutes ago, but he gave a little grizzle for a couple of seconds and then obviously fell back to sleep for another hour, with no help from me. Clever little boy!

    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.